_________________________________________________________________ FROM THE VIRTUAL DESK OF SANDY SANDFORT ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Today, Theodore Ts'o raised the specter of libel and slander to justify some forms of censorship for anonymous remailers. He assumed, rhetorically, that if you believe in total freedom of speech, than you must not believe in libel or slander. He is correct, of course. Nevertheless, his implied conclusion is in error. He would have us give up free speech to uphold libel and slander. I say, let's give up the artificial concepts of libel and slander and uphold our freedom of speech. Can people be harmed by speech? Maybe yes, maybe no. But if so, that is the price that must be paid to avoid a far greater harm. Damnum absque injuria--there are some loses for which there is no remedy at law. If your girlfriend impugns your manhood, there may be harm. But should her speech be ILLEGAL? I think not. I'm sure that what NBC did was NOT libel or slander. It may have been fraud, though. In any event, if a free society chose not to make what NBC did illegal, that in no way implies that NBC was "perfectly justified" in faking an explosion. It just says society takes any remedy out of the hands of the state. Of course, NBC's acts have already damaged its own reputation karma. Serves 'em right, too. One last note about practicality. We live in a world with pay telephones, which anyone may use to threaten anyone else, anonymously. Shall we eliminate pay phones? Today in the United States, a uniformed agent of the government will deliver your anonymous threat to your victims door for only US$0.29. Shall we eliminate the Postal Service? (The answer is "yes," but for other reasons.) So what's the point? Why should we be any harsher on the networks than we are on all the other anonymous channels? There is only one realistic and moral solution to threats of violence. Punish the perpetrators, not the messenger. Even in today's world, crimes are rarely solved by wiretaps, forensic science or any of that. Perps gets fingered by someone they know; perps confess; perps screw up and accidentally give themselves away; or the intended victim blows the perp's head off during an attempt to carry out the threat. Again, punish the perpetrators, not the messengers. S a n d y ssandfort@attmail.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~