----- Transcript of session follows ----- While talking to toad.com:
RCPT To:<cyhperpunks@toad.com> <<< 550 <cyhperpunks@toad.com>... User unknown 550 cyhperpunks@toad.com... User unknown
----- Unsent message follows ----- Received: by sun.Panix.Com id AA00914 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for cyhperpunks@toad.com); Sat, 17 Apr 1993 18:11:23 -0400 Received: by sun.Panix.Com id AA29602 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for habs); Sat, 17 Apr 1993 17:42:12 -0400 Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1993 17:42:12 -0400 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON> Message-Id: <199304172142.AA29602@sun.Panix.Com> To: habs Subject: Returned mail: User unknown Sender: habs ----- Transcript of session follows ----- While talking to toad.com:
RCPT To:<cypherpunk@toad.com> <<< 550 <cypherpunk@toad.com>... User unknown 550 cypherpunk@toad.com... User unknown
----- Unsent message follows ----- Received: by sun.Panix.Com id AA29600 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for extropians@gnu.ai.mit.edu); Sat, 17 Apr 1993 17:42:12 -0400 From: Harry Shapiro <habs> Message-Id: <199304172142.AA29600@sun.Panix.Com> Subject: PGP & RSA -> Legal To: cypherpunk@toad.com, extropians@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Harry Shapiro) Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1993 17:42:11 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: habs Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 698 I recall at some point that RSA put something out on the net which allowed anyone to use the "patents or source code" for non-commercial use. Do I remember correctly? (I replied to the announcement) If I am remembering correctly, would that give me a defacto licensing of PGP for con-commercial use? The reason I bring this up is that if the feds crack down, they many decide to "help" RSA by legally fighting PGP users. Which why it would be in our interest to legally (patent-wise, despite how you feel about RSA, etc.) use PGP. -- Harry Shapiro habs@panix.com List Administrator of the Extropy Institute Mailing List Private Communication for the Extropian Community since 1991