1 Jul
2002
1 Jul
'02
6:51 a.m.
My use of "anonym" was a joke. Sorry if it was too deadpan. But my serious point was that if a pseudonym costs nothing to get or give up, it makes one effectively anonymous, if one so chooses. On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:37:28AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
R. A. Hettinga wrote:
At 12:06 AM +0100 on 7/1/02, Ben Laurie wrote:
No, a pseudonym can be linked to stuff (such as reputation, publications, money). An anonym cannot.
More to the point, there is no such "thing" as an "anonym", by definition.
Hmm. So present the appropriate definition?
-- Barney Wolff I never met a computer I didn't like.