On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 06:01:25AM -0500, Gabriel Rocha wrote:
The latter statement my well be true, I don't use the network, nor know the ratios of good/bad traffic. But I am very curious to find out what
I don't have data either. I'm guessing the "bad" traffic part is 95-98%. (I'm extrapolating from absence, as the only responses to the abuse address were people harassed by idiots).
would be considered geographically "safe" jurisdictions in this sense. Not just today, but given the general trend, where would you see such a jurisdition being found in a year or five or ten?
While there is a distinct trend in NA, EU and elsewhere to try to snoop, and to control, it's not obvious the development is permanent, and irreversible. P2P traffic in general is increasing, and trivial remixing and encryption is becoming more and more widespread (arrr!). Spam and malware traffic also increases the noise level. You could claim your machine was infected with mixmaster malware, or something. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE http://moleculardevices.org http://nanomachines.net [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]