hi, --- Dave Howe <DaveHowe@cmn.sharp-uk.co.uk> wrote: . (Not
saying you do, just quibbling with any claim that readily calculated probabilities can be "surprising.") I meant surprising for Sarad - Much of this discussion pre-assumes that he *does* misunderstand probability but is willing to substitute our
collective insanity for his current ignorance :)
No more of that-I will have a good read. I am basically confused of the fact
In a perfectly random experiment,how many tails and how many heads do we get? we don't know - or it wouldn't be random :) for a sufficiently large sample you *should* see roughly equal numbers of heads and tails in the average case.
We say that, we-don't know or it wont be random. Then we say that we must see roughly equal numbers of heads and tails for large trials. Thats what I fail to understand. The idea of a perfect random experiment was taken just to understand the concept. Thanks. Regards Sarath. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com