Mark Grant wrote:
Could I humbly request that people don't post the new (SHA?) PGP signatures to the list for the time being as it's a pain in the ass for those of us outside the US who don't yet have the ability to read them. PGP 2.6.x error handling doesn't know what to do with them and it breaks our mail-processing code.
Mark
Well, I still use my RSA key for all signings and encryptions since about 85% of PGP users don't use the new Diffie-Hellman keys, and some asshole forgot to make PGP 5.0 freeware RSA key-generating. Luckily I can still use my RSA key. Plus, some assholes didn't take into account that not everyone uses Windoze95/NT 4.0 or Macintrash, and didn't make one yet for Unix or OS/2 or DOS or Windoze 3.1 users. My friend still uses 3.1 and I have to use my RSA key to talk to him. I hope you guys with the international PGP get to use 5.0 soon. It's really nice, all things about it excluded.