To reply to Jon Callas request for an apology for my rudeness, I'll offer a deal: - If I am unable to show you how to improve the GR (GAK resistance) property of a fully viable, implementable email security system within your choice of user requirement, ergonomic, and typical corporate environments restrictions, I will publically apologize for being rude, and for wasting your time. - However, in return: if I am succesful in proving to PGP Inc that they can improve the GR property of an email security system within their requirements, I _don't_ want an apology. I want something much more interesting: I want PGP Inc to implement and deploy it. - The group which will judge this process is PGP Inc. Do we have a deal? Adam -- Now officially an EAR violation... Have *you* exported RSA today? --> http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/ print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<> )]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`