John Young exposes a fascinating bit of regulatory arbitrage at: http://cryptome.org/dvd-v-fawkus.htm A Japanese company suing a Scotsman in California, for acts allegedly committed in Scotland. As the alleged fault consists of possessing software to read DVDs I don't think very many cypherpunks will sympathise with the plaintiffs. But it is interesting that they claim that they have jurisdiction over people in Scotland where AFAIK there is no criminal or civil law against copying DVDs. I'm not completely sure about that - over here in centralised, obedient, non-paranoid Britain, Scottish law is utterly different from English & some things are illegal in one country that are allowed in the other. FOr example in Scotland children can sue their parents for maintenance up to the age of 25 - now that *is* weird. Of course this is not the only high-profile case of regulatory arbitrage involving Scottish law at the moment. There are those Libyans accused of bombing the 'plane the blew up over Scotland who are being tried by a Scottish court in the Netherlands, the place having been temporarily re-classified as UK territory - they almost certainly could have been tried in the US or a number of other places as well. Maybe the California courts should take over supervision of Florida elections next? Ken