At 9:26 PM 3/2/96, Adam Shostack wrote:
My expectation would be that your numbers are not random in a cryptographic sense, and that this route of attack is much less efficient than others that would be used.
I'll note that PGP does NOT take your data entered and convert it to numbers, but takes timings to choose a hard to predict starting point for its prime searching.
Yes, which is why I said this in my post: "...With a reasonable amount of entropy, such as picking the next digit from several keyboard timings, I expect the 150-decimal-digit number to be *very* random!"
I'd expect this use of timings is better than using the large random number you entered, but in a theory sense only. Both are pretty difficult; thats why we like large numbers. :)
--Tim May Boycott "Big Brother Inside" software! We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed. ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Higher Power: 2^756839 - 1 | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."