David Honig writes:
At 12:55 PM 12/23/97 -0500, Colin Rafferty wrote:
William H Geiger writes:
In <ocryb1c2i2u.fsf@ml.com>, on 12/23/97 at 10:30 AM, Colin Rafferty <craffert@ml.com> said:
Paul Bradley writes:
Should the government be able to take action against me because I fire someone for being jewish/black/homosexual???
Welcome to the 20th Century, moron.
Really amazing how many so-called "freedom fighters" become STATIST if the proper buttons are pushed.
What are you talking about?
Freedom of expression is not the same as freedom of oppression.
You aren't being oppressed the other party doesn't want to interact with you, unless that party is government providing base services to all (e.g. police/courts/border protection).
Actually, you can be.
You *are* being oppressed if mutually consensual behavior is interfered with by others including the State.
You *are* being oppressed if you are coerced into a relationship you don't want.
You are not being coerced into anything. If you don't want to serve food to Blacks, don't open a restaurant. It's your choice. By the way, you are also not allowed to dump toxic waste in your own backyard. Are you being oppressed?
An employer-employee relationship is like a marriage or any other arrangement between adults -mutually consensual.
In a fantasy world, it is mutually consensual. It the real world, it is seldom mutual.
Colin, do you consider yourself oppressed when someone choses not to date you? What about a rejection by someone who takes out a public advertisement in the paper?
Nope. Of course, this has nothing to do with anything.
Freedom is only tested when it hurts.
With freedom comes responsibility. Decency is one of them. -- Colin