eridani@netcom.com (Belinda Bryan) wrote:
Sorry, Steve. I can't let this one go.
Uh, huh... [...]
I am speaking on behalf of myself and Gary L. Burnore.
Cat got his tongue?
When something is repeated often enough, some people will believe it to be true.
You mean something "repeated often enough" like this claim in your own header?:
Organization: Boycott E-Scrub Technologies. The owner is an admitted spambaiter.
You've repeated that smear against Ron Guilmette over and over. Doesn't your petty little vendetta against him get tiresome after awhile? OTOH, you really flipped out and royally potty-mouthed a poster a few months back for nothing more than a URL in his/her .sig advocating a boycott of Gary Burnore's former employer, Wells Fargo Bank, by the AIDS Action League. Flaming someone for a URL in a .sig with which you disagree is rather petty and censorious, don't you think?
All we ask is that you not share our physical addresses and our ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ non-published telephone numbers with anyone but your attorney. As you ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ may realize, there are a lot of kooks out there and I have a small child to protect. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Unlike other people (namely the one posting this crap anonymously), we have nothing to hide. ^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Really? Then why are you hiding your own post from being archived by a neutral third party? Trying to maintain "plausible deniability" if you post something you later regret saying and want to claim it was "forged"?
X-No-Archive: yes
Maybe you ought to get it through your head that some of us use "non-published e-mail addresses" for the same reason you wish to hide your own physical address and telephone number. You're right. "There are a lot of kooks out there", and bad things have a tendency to happen to people who dare to challenge the opinions of your buddy Gary "Sadaam" Burnore. Of course, it could be just another coincidence... Or maybe it's those "databasix goons" that "Rev. Tweek" referred to in his post. At any rate, you lost any credibility as being a friend of the right to privacy when you pulled your Helena Kobrin act this summer. Posing as a "lawyer" for DataBasix, you demanded that Jeff Burchell turn over all of his user logs to you and Gary, just as the so-called "Church" of $cientology did with the anon.penet.fi remailer in Finland last year. The end result was the same in both cases, too. Both remailers shut down to avoid the continued harassment from people like you, Gary, and Helena. I hope you're proud of yourselves.
Belinda Bryan eridani@netcom.com
--