There was an article in Z Magazine about the RC4 disclosure, and IP and information in general on the internet, in which the cypherpunks were mentioned. They got a lot of information confused about cypherpunks, but over all it was an interesting article. Here's the first portion of the article, in which cypherpunks were given prominence. If anyone wants to write them and clear up their confusion between anonymous remailers and mailing lists, or other errors about the 'punks (which generally cast us in a worse light then we should be), their address is: Z Magazine 18 Millfield St Woods Hole, MA 02543
As I've explained to Eric privately, I was the victim of a little editorial activism. The sentence about "the Cypherpunks' 'anonymous remailer,' list," is not mine. My original text included a longer description of remailers, which the editors decided to elide for the sake of brevity. This was done without my consent. As to "other errors," please clarify. I certainly had no intention of casting Cypherpunks in a bad light. -- Mark Chen chen@netcom.com 415/329-6913 finger for PGP public key D4 99 54 2A 98 B1 48 0C CF 95 A5 B0 6E E0 1E 1D