Safir said a suspect's DNA sample would be destroyed if he were acquitted or cleared.
Indeed, the innocent have very much to fear. Had Safir intended the above to be true, there would be no need to take the samples during the initial arrest of every person, only in those cases where it was necessary. And what will be the penalty for not destroying the DNA samples when the victim is acquitted or cleared? (Indeed, victim no longer applies to the person hurt by the alleged criminal, now the alleged criminal is also a victim.) So what's next, randomly arresting people driving through an intersection and then releasing them after their DNA is in the master catalog? Requiring DNA samples to get drivers licenses along and finger prints too? Having DNA samples in your driver's license and having random check points to make sure it matches your license? Using DNA as SSN's? Taking DNA samples with vaccination? Shades of Gataca! -- ---------------------------- Kaos Keraunos Kybernetos ------------------- + ^ + Sunder "The real aim of current policy is to /|\ \|/ sunder@sunder.net ensure the continued effectiveness of /\|/\ <--*--> ALLOW FREE EXPORT OF US information warfare assets against \/|\/ /|\ STRONG CRYPTOGRAPHY! individuals,businesses and governments \|/ + v + PROTEST WASSENAAR!!! in Europe and elsewhere" -- Ross Anderson ------------------------------ http://www.sunder.net ---------------------- RESTRICTED DATA - This material contains RESTRICTED DATA as defined in the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. Unauthorized disclosure subject to administrative and criminal sanctions. NOFORN ORCON WNINTEL SIOP-ESI CNWDI