* Reply to msg originally in CYPHERPUNKS
Uu> Q1: What cypherpunk remailers exist?
Uu> 1: nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu
Uu> 2: hh@cicada.berkeley.edu
Uu> 3: hh@pmantis.berkeley.edu
Uu> 4: hh@soda.berkeley.edu
Uu> 5: 00x@uclink.berkeley.edu
Uu> 6: hal@alumni.caltech.edu
Uu> 7: ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu
Uu> 8: remailer@rebma.mn.org
Uu> 9: elee7h5@rosebud.ee.uh.edu
Uu> 10: hfinney@shell.portal.com
Uu> 11: remail@tamsun.tamu.edu
Uu> 12: remail@tamaix.tamu.edu
Uu> 13: remailer@utter.dis.org
Uu> 14: remailer@entropy.linet.org
Uu> 15: remail@extropia.wimsey.com
OK. It seems that remail@extropia.wimsey.com (#15) is down. This is a
shame, as it was the _only_ remailer that would function as an anonymous
remailer for me. It worked beautifully while it was up. Its apparent
demise has been reported by other users as well,
. Several of the remailers listed (2,3,4,5) have _never_ worked using
standard cypherpunks syntax:
::
Request-Remailing-To:
. All other cypherpunks remailers, reliable or not, retain the footer
addresses automagically inserted by the host box here & are therefore
not in any way anonymous for my purposes. There was a discussion of a
"cut line" syntax before I temporarily lost access to cypherpunks, but
as far as I know there was never any agreement or implementation (I
shall be pleased to be corrected if this is not the case).
. Penet.fi will no longer work for me since the forced-password
implementation due to an apparent header conflict with the
X-Anon-Password: line & local host/gate software.
. Why am I depressed?
. ~
. M.
*********************************************************************
*