On Sat, 27 Apr 1996, E. ALLEN SMITH wrote:
From: IN%"unicorn@schloss.li" "Black Unicorn" 24-APR-1996 21:06:33.48
Thank you for the information.
Sure.
Speaking of attorneys, is there any way that an attorney can serve as an anonymous mail forwarder? The user would give the attorney permission to look at anything suspicious (e.g., mail from a credit card company) to make sure no fraud, theft, et al were being committed. Would this be covered under lawyer-client confidentiality in the US?
Well, using attorney client confidentality to shield things otherwise discoverable just doesn't work. There are many mail forwarding services that don't use attornies. An attorney is going to charge you by the hour for this service. I don't think you really want to pay for it.
In general adding a country to the money laundering offender list is a political decision and NOT demonstrative of a country's actual money laundering use. (Note that Vanuatu is not included, nor is Isle of Man). Mostly its a question of countries with corrupt officials who will look the other way, not of countries which strict banking privacy.
Fascinating.
Common sense really. This is a fact of life when dealing with the political arms of the United States.
This is nearly irresponsible reporting.
Reporters nowdays are getting so overloaded that they're taking information from whoever will talk to them. Look at what happened with the chips-in-Iraqui printer story.
Yep.
-Allen
--- My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li "In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti 00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com