Toto writes:
Just because an individual claims, rightly or wrongly, to be a big defender of freedom, involving himself or herself in causes like those of the Electronic Freedom Foundation, does not take away their right to stomp on anyone who disagrees with them on their own private list.
Of course
To claim otherwise would be as ludicrous as denying the person running the Anonymizer the right to expose the identities of the people he feels might perhaps be abusing his private system, or using it for nefarious purposes, such as hiding their identity from others.
I suspect you intended that to be sarcasm, but to be honest I wouldn't have caught it at all if I wasn't already aware of your views in this area. The person hosting the Anonymizer *does* have the right to do exactly this. I don't believe they would do so, but that is a reputation issue not a question of my rights. If I had entered into a contract with the provider of a service of this nature then I would have a 'right' to expect their contractual obligations to be fulfilled, but that is not the case with the Anonymizer and certainly not with toad.com. regards, -Blake (freedom of the press for those with presses)