28 Sep
2000
28 Sep
'00
8:17 a.m.
At 07:51 PM 9/27/00 -0400, Tim May wrote:
At 7:33 PM -0400 9/27/00, David Honig wrote:
It does create a single-point-of-failure if everyone uses the same library (or other independent 'module'), but on the other hand, everyone rolling their own is likely to introduce more fatal flaws.
Curious what the alternatives are,
I said nothing about "everyone rolling their own."
Yes, that was the most extreme contrast I could think of. A straw man. Obviously bad practice. What kind of modularity (not including linking a source-inspectable library) were you thinking of?