--- begin forwarded text
Delivered-To: clips@philodox.com
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:02:59 -0500
To: Philodox Clips List
From: "R. A. Hettinga"
Subject: [Clips] Rosenberg Reruns
Reply-To: rah@philodox.com
Sender: clips-bounces@philodox.com
http://www.opinionjournal.com/taste/?id=110007878
OpinionJournal
WSJ Online
DE GUSTIBUS
Rosenberg Reruns
They were guilty, but the left can't give up their cause.
BY JOSEPH RAGO
Friday, January 27, 2006 12:01 a.m. EST
You would think, by now, with a half-century of scholarship behind us and a
great deal of damning evidence on display, we would not have to be arguing
about the guilt or innocence of various iconic figures of the late 1940s
and 1950s: Alger Hiss, Harry Dexter White or, perhaps most notoriously,
Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. But the martyr status of such figures seems
irresistible, even today, to a certain kind of sentimental leftist. They
still remain symbols of some malevolent American quality--never mind the
truth of what they actually did.
Such was the lesson of a forum last week in Manhattan convened to discuss
the "artistic influence" of the Rosenbergs. The invitation to the event,
sponsored by the Fordham Law School, referred to the Rosenbergs as "the
accused." It was a tellingly exculpatory phrase. For the record, both
Julius and Ethel were convicted as communist spies and executed for
espionage in 1953.
The stars of the evening were the novelist E.L. Doctorow and the playwright
Tony Kushner. Mr. Doctorow is the author of "The Book of Daniel" (1971), a
novel that centers on a couple loosely patterned after the Rosenbergs; Mr.
Kushner wrote the play "Angels in America" (1993), which imagines the
specter of Ethel Rosenberg returning to haunt various protagonists. Both
works are highly sympathetic to the Rosenbergs' dilemma, if that is the
right word.
The forum was generally arcane and self-serious. Messrs. Doctorow and
Kushner ventilated many concerns about the relation of culture to society,
chief among them the obligation of the artist to accurately represent the
past. The pair eventually settled on the definition of historical art as
"an aesthetic system of opinions," as the good Doctorow put it.
Fair enough. But why would "the artist"--let alone anyone--still be hung up
on the Rosenbergs? To plow through the evidence for the millionth time:
While the trial of the Rosenbergs was flawed by technical improprieties,
their crimes are not uncertain or unresolved. Julius Rosenberg, with Ethel
as his accomplice, was the head of a sophisticated spy network that deeply
penetrated the American atomic program and relayed top secrets to Stalin's
Kremlin. In his memoirs Nikita Khrushchev noted that the Rosenbergs "vastly
aided production of our A-bomb." Joyce Milton and Ronald Radosh wrote a
damning account of their activities in "The Rosenberg File" (1983). And the
Rosenbergs' guilt was corroborated by the 1995 declassification of the
Venona documents, thousands of decrypted KGB cables intercepted by the
National Security Agency in the 1940s.
The notion that anyone would today deny their fundamental complicity in
Soviet subversion is extraordinary, almost comically so. But comedy was not
quite the mentality at the Rosenberg event. "Ambiguity is the key word, I
think," said Mr. Doctorow, regarding our understanding of the past, though
in this instance ambiguous is precisely what it is not.
Mr. Kushner argued the Rosenbergs were "murdered, basically." Mr. Doctorow
went further, explaining that he wanted to use their circumstances to tell
"a story of the mind of the country." It was a mind, apparently, filled
with loathing and paranoia--again, never mind the truth of the charges
against the Rosenbergs or other spies of the time. "The principles of the
Cold War had reached absurdity," he continued. "We knew that the Russians
were no threat, but we wanted to persuade Americans to be afraid" and so
impose "a Puritan, punitive civil religion." Pronounced Mr. Kushner: "Our
failure to come to terms with a brutal past, our failure to open up the
coffins and let the ghosts out, has led to our current, horrendous
situation."
The enduring artistic influence of the Rosenberg case, then, seems to be
primarily allegorical. Guilt and innocence drop away (rather, guilt is
converted to virtue) and the Rosenbergs are made into victims of "American
fascism," to use Ethel Rosenberg's own phrase. Or to borrow the exquisite
formulation of the scholar-apologist Ellen Schrecker, the Rosenbergs were
guilty only of "nontraditional patriotism."
The arts should not be judged entirely on political character, of course.
But in considering an "aesthetic system of opinions" when the aesthetics
are pointless bathos and the opinions are the whole point, politics ought
to be taken into account. And for all the hand-wringing about fidelity to
historical accuracy, the point is that Messrs. Doctorow and Kushner get the
politics so wrong.
As the artists turned the Rosenbergs' treason into dissent and then into
patriotism, the audience was enthusiastically in tune. Present were the
Rosenbergs' children, Robert and Michael Meeropol, who continue to contest
their parents' Soviet entanglement, and the former editor of the Nation,
Victor Navasky. When it came time to ask questions, the moderator warned
off any "Cold War warriors" from asking "disrespectful" questions, like,
presumably, how these authors could defend an ideology that took millions
of lives. No one did.
Mr. Rago is an assistant features editor of The Wall Street Journal's
editorial page.
--
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
_______________________________________________
Clips mailing list
Clips@philodox.com
http://www.philodox.com/mailman/listinfo/clips
--- end forwarded text
--
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'