i'll resist the urge to point out farm animal skin tones probably weren't filtered, either. eieio. -----Original Message----- From: owner-cypherpunks@Algebra.COM [mailto:owner-cypherpunks@Algebra.COM]On Behalf Of Alan Olsen Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 12:00 AM To: David Honig Cc: Phillip H. Zakas; Ray Dillinger; Declan McCullagh; cypherpunks@cyberpass.net; fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu Subject: RE: DOJ steps up child porn fight, plan regulates digital cameras On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, David Honig wrote:
but while working
for aol i remember companies trying to sell me on the concept of 'anti-porn' pic filtering software. it worked by looking for a high percentage of flesh tones in a pic.
Yeah but all that blue latex and black leather screws up the pinkfilter. To say nothing of the feathers, whipped cream, or blood.
Or that not all people are pink. This sounds like an interesting descrimination suit waiting to happen. ]:> "Your porn filter descriminates for people of color!" alan@ctrl-alt-del.com | Note to AOL users: for a quick shortcut to reply Alan Olsen | to my mail, just hit the ctrl, alt and del keys. "In the future, everything will have its 15 minutes of blame."