-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 At 1:52 AM -0700 10/9/97, Adam Back wrote:
I notice that the quality of anonymous submissions to the discussion here on cypherpunks has increased markedly lately.
I can see a couple of reasons why this might be: Monty Cantsin seems to write consistently good stuff, Tim May announced he may be using some nyms, and we have this big argument with PGP Inc where their
Thanks for the sort-of compliment, but I haven't been using anonymous remailers much at all the last couple of years. Someone wrote to me saying he suspected I was "Monty Cantsin." Nope. I know denials like this mean nothing to some of you--they certainly meant nothing to Detweiler several years ago. But, for the record, virtually every comment I have made on this list in the last couple of years has been under my own name. I agree that some good comments have come from anonymous posters. - --Tim May (I'll sign this with my new PGP 5.0 key, which has also been signed with my 1992 PGP 2.0 key) The Feds have shown their hand: they want a ban on domestic cryptography - ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, ComSec 3DES: 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Higher Power: 2^2,976,221 | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBNDz7rVK3AvrfAt9qEQKzBgCglwLRdegEL/ubNrGydVfktiDY9vEAoNPI cUMblxJZFITqeliKe36RgkKB =6oOe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----