15 Feb
2001
15 Feb
'01
2:26 a.m.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 01:55:45PM +0200, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
But why should this be limited to the book stores? The same should go for laudries etc. In this sense we *are* talking about privileges to those dealing with 1st Amendment protected material, like the press and book stores. Declan's problem obviously is that while free speech has constitutional protection in itself, here *privacy* is protected only via extension of the 1st Amendment protection. This isn't enough.
That's a nice way to word it, and sums my thoughts up nicely. -Declan