At 12:38 PM 4/30/2003 -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
At 9:33 AM -0400 4/30/03, John Kelsey wrote:
Geez, Bob, sometimes you do it because it's *fun*.
Agreed.
However, try have fun all your life and not getting paid for it. Artists are a good example, but you can't do that all your life without money either. There aren't a whole lot of landed aristocracy in the world, for instance, or even those who live on trust funds. Or who are even retired. :-).
I believe it was Albert Einstein that suggested budding physicists not strive for professional careers but engage in full-time work in some other area (perhaps in a trade). Treat science as an avocation, something that can be successfully pursued in one's spare time. (He did some of his most important work while engaged as a patent examiner). Today, there are still quite a few people engaged in amateur astronomy. They toil night after night taking measurements and making observations. Many might think its all for naught, what could they possibly contribute to serious science now that there is Hubble and are so many large instruments managed by professional astronomers and staffs. And they would be wrong. In the past decade appropriate electronic image sensors have dramatically improved in performance and dropped in price. Smaller amateur instruments, some not all that small, now have many of the capabilities that formerly were the province of the large professional variety prior to such sensors. Also, the sky is vast and most of the professional instruments have very small fields of view. Someone has to tell where to look. Often its the professional astronomers pursuing some esoteric work, but increasingly its the thousands of astronomers and their keen eyes which first spot important amateurs. The result, amateurs (who were not long ago looked upon by professionals as charming relics) are now receiving increased respect and increasingly partnering with professionals on important work (and being named as co-authors of published papers). Of course these amateurs aren't paid, so why or how do they do it? Many are retired and rather than touring in country their mobile homes or watching the grandchildren have embarked on a sort of second or third career. Others take advantage of computers and the electronic sensors to run sky patrol cameras so the telescope does most all the work and they still have their full-time careers. I see no reason why important security, crypto or financial crypto developments must be linked with direct or immediate financial compensation. steve