At 10:01 PM -0500 9/24/98, James A. Donald wrote:
-- At 9:12 PM -0500 9/23/98, James A. Donald wrote:
To rig a jury by excluding undesirables such as Tim May would be far too laborious. To rig a jury it would be necessary to
At 09:52 AM 9/24/98 -0500, Petro wrote:
No, no, On the contrary, far too easy.
There are certain people who are NEVER called to jury duty, people convicted of felonies & etc. simply put the name of an undesirable on this list,
The number of identifiable undesirables is too small to guarantee the desired trial outcome. To ensure a desired outcome it would be necessary to screen out a very large number of potential undesirables. It would be much easier to screen in a small number of desirables.
At first yes, but over time the list could/would be grown. Also, the list of non-criminal undersirables is _only_ those people who would WANT to serve on the jury, but are too smart/savy/stubborn to pant at the feet of the lawyers. -- petro@playboy.com----for work related issues. I don't speak for Playboy. petro@bounty.org-----for everthing else. They wouldn't like that. They REALLY Economic speech IS political speech. wouldn't like that.