-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 10:20:23PM -0700, petro wrote:
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 06:48:48PM -0700, Tim May wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, [iso-8859-1] Ing. Fausto C.G. wrote:
I dont now where did you get my e-mail, but I am receiving spam from you. Stop it right now, please, I didnt ask you for your spam. This time I am asking it kindly, next time I wont ask it this way.
Do your best, you fucking twit.
People like you who threaten us need to be taken out and shot.
We are adding you to the special "high spam diet."
Hope you like it, jerk.
Come on, lighten up. The guy's receiving spam, and like most people, he gets pissed about it. So he sends a nasty email to the address in the From: line of the spams. Can you blame him?
He's not getting spam. He's been subscribed to the cypherpunks list by someone.
OK. Still, he's getting unwanted email, and it's not his fault (I assume).
And yes, I can blame him for being clueless.
Clueless how? Because he hadn't heard of the cypherpunks list? Or is there some other reason he's clueless? - -- Nathan Saper (natedog@well.com) | http://www.well.com/user/natedog/ GnuPG (ElGamal/DSA): 0x9AD0F382 | PGP 2.x (RSA): 0x386C4B91 Standard PGP & PGP/MIME OK | AOL Instant Messenger: linuxfu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE57kaN2FWyBZrQ84IRAhScAKC/Dtx0+PmBHqet683PL1rjulpPJwCgtjAc jvanZ8YDImxw5PDks78RFNU= =R624 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----