![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/8f589e3dd812fb528b972171dd84764d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
"Charlie" == Charlie Comsec <comsec@nym.alias.net> writes:
Charlie> Have you got a URL I can check out which explains this Charlie> protocol and how it's superior to, let's say, PGP? The protocols where suggested by the anonymous person 'Monty Cantsin'. There were 3 relevant emails regarding that protocol to the mailing list cypherpunks@Algebra.COM. For anyone who has missed those emails I have put it at http://www.snafu.de/~zahn/cantsin.txt The protocol (currently) only specifies a format for a digital signature of documents or parts of documents. The algorithms used are SHA1 and ElGamal. There is currently no encryption specified. In contrast PGP 2.x used RSA and MD5 and has encryption with IDEA, PGP 5.x has another collection of algorithms. Compared to PGP, that exists as commercial software, my package is an experimental proof of concept, so it is not 'superior'. Regards Steffen -- home email: user@domain where domain=berlin.snafu.de, user=zahn Use of my address for unsolicited commercial advertising is forbidden. "Where do you want to crash today?" 25BA1A9F5B9010DD8C752EDE887E9AF3 [Cantsin Protocol No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