On Mon, 25 Mar 1996, Bill Frantz wrote:
At 1:32 PM 3/25/96 -0500, Black Unicorn wrote: to type them. Since storage was limited, and old messages were purged from the system it also had the effect that anti-trust discovery would have nothing to discover.
Hmmm - that's another issue; what about diffie hellman with ephemeral keys? Once the transaction is complete, unless you keep a copy of the key, even you can't decrypt that session. Would a law requiring you to keep a copy of the keys be important. It would have the advantage of allowing a sub-poena to be more restrictive than "just hand over your private key", but it's a pretty heavy (undue?) burden. Simon --- They say in online country So which side are you on boys There is no middle way Which side are you on You'll either be a Usenet man Which side are you on boys Or a thug for the CDA Which side are you on? National Union of Computer Operatives; Hackers, local 37 APL-CPIO