On Fri, Apr 04, 1997 at 01:41:38PM -0500, John Young wrote:
On Phil Hallam-Baker's rejoinder to Paul Bradley' defense of AP: [...]
Rushdie, hmm. Phil what mind-swill you elbow-tipping? Is Rushie not closer to Jim Bell than he is to you in challenging the arrogant mullahs of highly sophisticated armed thuggery. Who you shillinging for these days, Crispin's bandits of the NLs?
Crispin shills for himself, not the NLs or any bandits or anyone else. Phil Hallam-Baker shills for Phil Hallam-Baker. Jim Bell's advocacy of armed thuggery speaks for itself. -- Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited", kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke... PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55 http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html