-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- The following article is a story of financial repression, pure and simple. Tax "slavery" is nothing new; taxation itself being legalized theft, the very existence proof of subjugation to any so-called "sovereign" throughout history. In various forms, the U.S. has had an official policy of universal taxation of individual income and assets for more than a hundred and fifty years. Since the advent of income taxes, "any source whatever" has been the rule, with no exceptions, no matter where in the world that source exists. The telegraph made it conceivable. The Hollerith card made it possible. The electronic computer made it profitable, and ubiquitous global internetworks now make it inescapable. Financial cryptography once held out hopes of changing the rules of the game, but the chance of, shall we say, hope and change, diminishes daily on that front. As we're seeing below, when universally networked book-entry settlement permits a geographic force-monopoly to forbid, defacto, a human being's rights to ownership of financial assets outside its borders, accelerating its already asymptotic claims to an otherwise free peoples' income and private property as its own, it's an act no less repressive than installing a concertina wire fence at the border and giving the guards orders to shoot to kill. Immediately, if this kind of policy is not rescinded somehow, I expect that except where a US bank is already present in a country, many US citizens abroad wil become "unbanked". That might not be a bad thing, if it accelerates the advent of the kind of global non-bank finance that cryptographers have presaged -- for almost twenty years now. However, since the US government has pretty much outlawed non-bank finance inside its own borders, and seems to be in the process of outlawing the private ownership of banks themselves, things might get much worse before they get any better. Cheers, RAH --------- <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/5374095/Br itish-banks-revolt-against-Obama-tax-plan.html> Sunday 24 May 2009 | Banks and Finance feed | All feeds The Telegraph British banks revolt against Obama tax plan British banks and stockbrokers may refuse to take on American clients if new international tax proposals outlined by President Obama are passed. By Louise Armitstead Last Updated: 12:02AM BST 24 May 2009 The decision, which would make it hard for Americans in London to open bank accounts and trade shares, is being discussed by executives at Britain's banks and brokers who say it could become too expensive to service American clients. The proposals, which were unveiled as part of the president's first budget, are designed to clamp-down on American tax evaders abroad. However bank bosses say they are being asked to take on the task of collecting American taxes at a cost and legal liability that are inexpedient. Andy Thompson of Association of Private Client Investment Managers and Stockbrokers (APCIMS) said: "The cost and administration of the US tax regime is causing UK investment firms to consider disinvesting in US shares on behalf of their clients. This is not right and emphasises that the administration of a tax regime on a global scale without any flexibility damages the very economy it is trying to protect." One executive at a top UK bank who didn't want to be named for fear of angering the IRS said: "It's just about manageable under the current system - - - - and that's because we're big. The danger to us is suddenly being hauled over the coals by the IRS for a client that hasn't paid proper taxes. The audit costs will soar. We'll have to pay it but I know plenty of smaller players won't." The British Bankers Association (BBA) and APCIMS had a meeting with European counterparts 10 days ago to discuss the crisis. A delegation is set to meet the US Treasury's Internal Revenue Service on 16th June to demand they drop the reforms. Ahead of the meeting APCIMS, whose members manage #400bn of Britain's wealth and employ 25,000 people, has sent a letter to the IRS complaining that the "unfair" proposals represent "no benefit but... significant cost" to its members. President Obama's proposals are built on the so-called Qualified Intermediary system which was intended to ensure Americans paid the correct tax wherever they were domiciled. Foreign financial institutions that handle American money have to fill in a US tax form on behalf of the client that has to be audited too. In return, the banks receive a QI seal of approval as a qualified intermediary. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 9.10.0.500 wsBVAwUBShmQmsUCGwxmWcHhAQGuhwf/eQrR8Zwq7NE1fYy/0vqXdjzah2UcwP6+ EUOGyDiLiGm6XiydWv+z9EtSlKpcaw+BGm7ICHoAtPH5BJIjTea6FHKjTa5I6VK8 pWSTHrjju17hTju+QP36n1GoA/EXhCZ93rOmeYhZ8PzT1ctBsTlNJFHGA/2kImA4 zv187UQQKJeLKb3jbtBOF7AL/SYFiQWmFQBj2gaqUwXLV4HoLD0vBdqxKaI4PljU hv3kybIZxV0v8+9s9WXUhvC87Pf2YgIVO2wDgoYqPWyLVAFWewvelFea4JRtEqyu a0ILVIxIMEDdz/KlQj63l6AYiI5HQ4rA153RjfDp0lQOjAgKwiT6Pg== =3heG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----