![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/35060df691ee4d7eb2b448ee8ee34dff.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Pierre van Rooyen wrote:
Will you please try to decrypt the following, I want to make sure it is not decryptable. - The first paragraph decrypted reads:
There are plenty of programs you could buy such as Floodgate to pull your own addresses however, these programs (even when used properly) can take up to 6 months just to pull as many as 750,000 addresses! And after THAT time has elapsed you're database will have plenty of addresses that are undeliverable.
Now, the list is receiving encrypted CipherSpam. I'm getting brainlock, here. Is this development: 1. Good? (CypherPunks is forcing even Spammers to use crypto?) 2. Bad? (Spammers think CypherPunks are so dumb they will 'work' for their spam?) 3. Ambivalent? (It doesn't really matter, because my brain has turned to spam?) Toto