Matt Blaze wrote:
I'm afraid you're confused. Whoever this report was about, it wasn't me: ...
Not a important question but isn't this the sort of message that would benefit most from a PGP signature? I checked on the certserver and it did locate a 512 bit key RSA key from 1993. I don't routinely sign or encrypt my email but I remain curious about decisions others make. In a program on NPR a few years ago I recall a few luminaries were ardently discussing the issues involved in encryption but when asked late in the program how they used encrryption themselves they all quickly said that it was just too cumbersome. Steve Bryan Vendorsystems International email: sbryan@vendorsystems.com icq: 5263678 pgp fingerprint: D758 183C 8B79 B28E 6D4C 2653 E476 82E6 DA7C 9AC5