17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
6:17 p.m.
On Fri, 11 Jul 1997, Anonymous wrote:
Remember "the internet interprets censorship as damage and routes around it"? I'd be happy with an internet that interprets DAMAGE as damage and routes around it.
It does.. It's just that when you lose a *large* access point, the impact is significant. (I think that's what happened here...)
Seems to me that having only a few, heavily trafficed, NAPs is a topological weakness in the Net which needs to be delt with soon. --Steve