On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 09:38:46AM -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
My point was that this is a natural outgrowth of existing child porn and obscenity laws, and if you're upset at this, you should naturally be upset at the entire framework.
Then your point is invalid. Simply because the application or extension of something is harmful or undesirable doesn't map to the entire framework being bad.
It's a common failing of C-A-C-L based theologies.
You don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Jim, I don't understand what you mean. Perhaps you can quote the relevant section of the U.S. Constitution you're talking about, and follow it up with some Slashdot URLs? Some week-old wire service articles would be a big help too. Your fan, Declan