30 May
2002
30 May
'02
12:46 p.m.
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Anonymous wrote:
David Hopwood writes:
Did I miss a separate message in which David Hopwood followed up to my post? Cypherpunks is more reliable for me than it used to be, but it's not always all there.
math is really advanced and not many implementors or users are likely to understand it very well. Sure we've got a library but the kind of people who want forward security would like to understand the principles a little better.
Thanks for the detailed summary! Even if the system may not be ready for prime time, I think it may still be worth looking at it and following future developments. -David