At 2:43 AM -0700 8/23/97, Adam Back wrote:
There are a few evolutionary pressures, but they are insignificant compared to all the negative pressures.
Positive examples?
- motorbike riding - aggresive drivers - manic depressives - mountain climbers - hard drug takers - drug pushers - DEA agents
I have no idea if the traits associated with these activities are to be considered good or bad, bright or not bright, heritable or not heritable, etc. Does the slightly greater tendency of mountain climbers to die earlier than philosophers mean anything? I doubt it. ...
Have lots of children .. to counteract the welfare cases tendencies. Mormon polygamy? Harem?
(Again not following own advice, only two children ... so far).
Main point: The human genome is now "weighed down" with more than 7 billion persons, a large fraction of them still capable of reproducing. Bluntly put, it ain't going _anywhere_, at least not very fast. Changes in the characteristics of a species, loosely speaking, "evolution," happen faster in small populations. The tribe of hominids forced out of trees by loss of forestation in the Rift Zone, for example, will undergo rapid changes over a few hundred generations. Billions of humans in the modern era, with essentially everyone reaching reproductive age, will not. The human genome is like a supertanker being hit by tennis balls: it just won't move. Minor point: Adam's children will most likely tend toward the mean. Smart people tend to mate with other smart people, more or less. Dumb people tend to mate with other dumb people, more or less. Lots of reasons for this, but look around and confirm it. So, this will lead to an ever-broader Bell curve of intelligence, right? Nope. For whatever complicated reasons, the curve has essentially reached its "normal broadness," to invent a phrase. Or so I think is the case. Certainly there are ample statistics to show this. Other minor point, possibly major: The ROI on the human genome for Adam to have more children, so as to counteract the stupid breeding more stupid people, is virtually nil. If Adam likes children, or wants them around him for whatever reason, fine. But any notion that 2 or 3 or even 5 children will affect the genome is wishful thinking. Look at the math. (And not even the infamous "But what if _all_ smart and educated people thought this way?" applies. First, what Adam or Tim or Blanc does about having children will not affect the decisions of others. Magical Thinking 101 again. Second, the aforementioned tendency to the mean, for complicated biochemical/genetic reasons. Third, even if Adam's children inherited a persistent "gene for intelligence" which passed on undiminished with time (or at least in proportion to other such genes from other reproductive partners in the future), think of how many generations until Adam's magic gene is in just 0.001% of the population. Hint: a lot.) Have children if you personally want them, but don't think your having or not having children has anything to do with saving the species.
The problem is that from a purely scientific evolutionary point of view, the human race is surely regressing, the masses of negative evolutionary pressures are certainly pushing this way.
I doubt this in the strongest possible way. Australia was populated by the common criminals of England, the louts and scoundrels and thieves and murderers. (Perhaps some "political prisoners," but mostly common criminals.) And yet within a generation or two, Australia was thriving, and today nobody would argue that the descendants of convicts are dumb or backward. We aren't changing the genome. --Tim May There's something wrong when I'm a felon under an increasing number of laws. Only one response to the key grabbers is warranted: "Death to Tyrants!" ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Higher Power: 2^1398269 | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."