On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, petro wrote:
The key word in that sentence was "trace", meaning just that--a trace. In the pseudononymous remailers there is a back trace to follow.
Not if you do it right. Hell, forge your source header on sends (as a starter, there are lots more ways to do this).
Either way, if the ability to map email address to meat space identity is less than very, very hard for a government to do *technically* then it really isn't anonymous.
Agreed. I'd say it isn't anonymous at all, in fact. It's fortunate the TCP/IP and related protocols are so sloppy and easy to munge. ____________________________________________________________________ He is able who thinks he is able. Buddha The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage@ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------