On Tue, 7 May 1996, jim bell wrote:
At 04:46 PM 5/7/96 -0400, Black Unicorn wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. I sent the text of the law to the list. The position that you take (that increse in inflation can send you into the next tax bracket) is incorrect.
You seem to be forgetting that one of the provisions of (I believe) the 1986 tax act was that capital gains would be indexed for inflation. However, the sleazy politicians only scheduled it (the indexing process) for about 1990 or so, and by 1990 they managed to get that idiot Bush to agree to drop it.
Considering that there is one bracket for capital gains income (namely 28%) what does this have to do with bouncing you into the next income tax bracket?
I don't know the details, but this is yet another of the reasons I have no qualms about advocating a system for solving the "politician problem" by putting them 6 feet under.
And yet another reason you cite which is based on incorrect facts.
Lawyers who profit from an abusive system may disagree, of course.
So may all individuals who have a clue.
Jim Bell jimbell@pacifier.com
--- My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li "In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti 00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com