Um, what court of law? Afghanistan isn't the 51's state of the union. Al qaeda didn't sign any treaties with any organization, it's not part of Nato or the UN... Why even bother with a "court?" If bin Ladin is caught, he should be shot on sight, or at least "interrogated" none of this bullshit kangaroo court crap. I'm begining to think that bin Ladin is becoming the modern version of Emmanuel Goldstein, afghanistan is "oceania", and iraq is "eursaia"... and CNN provides the mandatory two minutes of hate... ----------------------Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos--------------------------- + ^ + :Surveillance cameras|Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\ \|/ :aren't security. A |share them, you don't hang them on your/\|/\ <--*-->:camera won't stop a |monitor, or under your keyboard, you \/|\/ /|\ :masked killer, but |don't email them, or put them on a web \|/ + v + :will violate privacy|site, and you must change them very often. --------_sunder_@_sunder_._net_------- http://www.sunder.net ------------ On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
http://www.megastories.com/attack/aip/02jan03/wahdat020103.shtml Thursday 3 January 2002
ISLAMABAD (Wahdat): The deputy chief of Afghan intelligence, Abdullah Tauhidi, has claimed that intelligence officials have acquired a number of new videotapes of Osama bin Laden and his associates in the al-Qaeda network.
The videotapes show clearer camera work, which could be far better proof for a court of law to put the most wanted man on trial in connection with the September 11 terrorist attacks, he said in an interview.