Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com> writes:
Ryan Lacket <rdl@mit.edu> writes:
Traditional law enforcement takes so long to investigate, the keys could be canceled and replaced several times.
This is another problem with the entire crypto process as now implimented. Users of keys, either for encryption or signing, tend to think of the keys as long term entities. Considering the increase in computing power, the coming ubiquity of law enforcement monitoring on the network, increased payoff for hackers as the traffic of personal info increases, and general human failure keys should in fact be changed often (say a couple of times a year, annualy at least)
Make that instant key changes for mixmaster remailers by using forward secrecy and direct IP delivery to enable the interactive communications pattern required for immediate forward secrecy. Ulf Moeller (current mixmaster maintainer) has this on his to do list I think. Even for email, I spent a lot of time arguing with PGP Inc employees about how forward secrecy could be obtained within PGP 5.x. (The OpenPGP list seems to have gone dead... wonder what is going on.) The separate encryption and signature keys provided by PGP 5.x / OpenPGP allow you to have short lived encryption keys, and longer lived signature keys. The web of trust is provided by the signature keys. PGP 5.x implements automatic key update. It is cheap to generate new Elgamal keys every week or day or whatever if you share the public prime modulus. You can also opportunistically send use once Elgamal keys in messages which allows someone to have even more immediate forward secrecy. In addition you can use interactive forward secrecy between mail hubs, and you can also authenticate this with PGP's web of trust using a design I posted to cypherpunks and ietf-open-pgp towards the end of last year with a subject of something like "PGP WoT authenticated forward secrecy". Adam