17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
On Tue, 13 Aug 1996, Lucky Green wrote:
At 9:27 8/13/96, Peter Trei wrote:
I vaguely remember another possibly relevant precedent, where a judge ruled that a warrant was required before a thermal imager could be used to look at a house suspected by the police of being a (pot) grow house.
Wrong. No warrant was used and the bust was upheld in court.
Correct. No warrant is required to observe that which is freely collected after eminating from the residence of another and observed off his property. Same concept applies to the "sniff" test and ariel views into greenhouses. -- I hate lightning - finger for public key - Vote Monarchist unicorn@schloss.li