fgle@sun1.uconect.net spammed:
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by toad.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA09438 for cypherpunks-outgoing; Fri, 3 Jan 1997 07:09:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from sun1.uconect.net ([206.156.42.50]) by toad.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA09425 for <cypherpunks@toad.com>; Fri, 3 Jan 1997 07:09:27 -0800 (PST) From: fgle@sun1.uconect.net Received: from fgle.uconect.net ([206.156.55.17]) by sun1.uconect.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA13920 for <cypherpunks@toad.com>; Fri, 3 Jan 1997 10:07:22 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Jan 1997 10:07:22 -0500 Message-Id: <199701031507.KAA13920@sun1.uconect.net> To: cypherpunks@toad.com Subject: invitation Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com Precedence: bulk X-Newsgroups: list.cypherpunks
Fuck_God_Up_The_Ass,
[snip]
Douglas Cymbala Membership Department
I somehow doubt that Douglas has sufficient Vaseline to fulfill his erotic fantasies! (Or his "god" is rather small...) How many clueless spammers need to get stung by indiscriminately posting to spam-bait addresses planted in Usenet until they figure out that it's a Really Bad Idea[tm]? I've heard rumors that at least one idjit spammer lost his account for spamming a religious mailing list with something like that! Can you say "oops"?