Re: Why? (fwd)

Forwarded message:

Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 22:54:15 -0700 From: Bill Frantz Subject: Re: Why? (fwd)

At 7:49 PM -0700 9/30/97, Jim Choate wrote:

...

My original question still stands, why would I or any other party choose to use an anonymous remailer for anything other than the original 3 items I mentioned previously.

Black Unicorn uses a nym to express opinions he expects his coworkers and acquaintances would not like. Anonymous remailers can be used for the same purpose.

Ok, I believe that falls under the 'bitching' category.

I have heard of people's posts being brought up in employment interviews. A rational person might want to express controversial opinions anonymously.

And your point is? My personal opinions have nothing to do with my professional career and yours shouldn't either. I would love to have a company bring up my past posts, makes it easy to decide if I want to work there or not. If you want to work for such a company and you know their views and your views are in conflict then I would say you need a shrink not an anon. remailer. ____________________________________________________________________ | | | The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there | | be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves. | | | | -Alan Greenspan- | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http:// www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage@ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|