I write:
This seems to me to be a very robust pseudonymous mail system which could be implemented by relatively minor changes to the existing Cypherpunk remailer structure.
Eli <ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu> writes:
This appears to be the ARA system that was previously suggested, which I was speaking of using with penet. Your comment that changes would be needed implies that it is different; if so, could you clarify the difference?
No, evidently I wasn't reading carefully enough. These do appear to be the same.
The reason Eric suggested hanging this off the side of a pseudonym server is that it is rather inconvenient in its pure form,
Although I would suggest making the raw data available to those who wish to bypass the nym server for some reason. Say, a "Request-Routing-Header <anon_id>", command. Although I imagine you guys have your hands full getting even a basically functional version up. -- Will