17 Dec
2003
17 Dec
'03
11:17 p.m.
"Anonymous" == Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM> writes:
Anonymous> harder to keep our real ID secret. (E.g., an Anonymous> oversimplified scenario would be if an attacker sends a Anonymous> message to all three nyms, then watches three PGP Anonymous> conventionally encrypted messages arrive in our Anonymous> mailbox.) What's wrong with having a nym point to yet another nym on a different server? Has anyone thought of that?