On Thu, 10 Aug 1995, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
It looks very much like the sort of typo you would get from a mistranslation from assembly language if the target architecture had a *4-bit* processor. (This is also consistant with the "<<4"'s which show up in several places in the code).
I'll back up the disassembly theory. I've done it myself once when I lost some of my own source code from years previous and had to get out the dissassembler. Very painful work which resulted in a first set of source much like the "S1" sample posted here. Only difference was that I went back over the "first draft" after verifying it and cleaned it up somewhat. The poster either does not know 'C' or thinks that a cleanup will reveal his/her style. - Andy +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Andrew Brown Internet <asb@nexor.co.uk> Telephone +44 115 952 0585 | | PGP (2048/9611055D): 69 AA EF 72 80 7A 63 3A C0 1F 9F 66 64 02 4C 88 | +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+