-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In article <ac4eb0c9030210046e6c@[205.199.118.202]>, tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May) wrote:
I have nothing further to add on this. But recall that it was just about this time last year--just before Crypto--that the "alleged RC4 code" was posted anonymously to the list.
Do I recall correctly that that RC4 proved to interoperate with the "real" RC4? - -- - -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred. - --- [This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the signature and forwarded.] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: Gratis auto-signing service iQBFAwUBMCr2PCoZzwIn1bdtAQEUPAF/S1arfdr01B+/o5MlEX6F60NHUL6vgEPQ sv3264ZCsJAl7TBqqyi1a6baBF7uuTh+ =jhLU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----