At 10:05 PM 12/24/98 -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
Forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 19:50:34 -0600 (CST) From: Missouri FreeNet Administration <measl@mfn.org> Subject: Re: I must admit. . .
On Thu, 24 Dec 1998, Reeza! finally got to the point of the matter:
<massive snip> :, that does not mean I'm willing to allow one :expansionist dictator to sanction another country and gain control of :enough of the worlds oil supply to impact the well-being of my country.
I believe this is the the only true argument here. The US (and you) are not "pleased" with the fact that the one place on the planet that has the worlds largest oil deposits is not beholden to the USG.
Actualy there are equivalent oil and gas deposits in SE Asia and Antartica. But they doesn't belong to the USG either.
Of course the point is valid. Though it almost begs the question of why in such a situation there is not a more powerful search for alternatives. There are actualy very few technologies that care whether oil or gas is used in energy production or some entirely different process.
Which point? Yours, or J.A.'s??? I thought the point wasn't about control of that segment of the oil supply, I was voicing my personal opinion there. Rather, the point was about the sanction of a sovereign neighbor nation, and our (The US's) actions in forcing Hussein back as part of a world community effort. Whether our "sticking our noses into it" as J.A. said earlier, was justifiable. I agree we should be pursuing alternative energies with greater diligence, I'd like to see what the petroleum companies have on their shelves and are suppressing. Reeza! ============================================================================ DH Key available upon request. The affairs of Men rarely rely on the dictates of logic, or even common sense. "Yeah, they mostly rely on something below the belt." -- my older sister