8 Nov
2009
8 Nov
'09
2:14 p.m.
--- On Sun, 11/8/09, John Young <jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com> Subject: Re: managing and protecting nyms... To: cypherpunks@al-qaeda.net Date: Sunday, November 8, 2009, 11:01 PM Peer review is necessary to assure blunders are not overlooked. However, there has been no demonstration that peer review is all that is needed for the superior protection. This is not an argument for obscurity, only a caution that peer review is not necessary sufficient. Peers miss stuff too, as amply demonstrated by holes and bad implementation later discovered.
Since it is discovered later, isn't that called peer review? Sarad.