lists.cpunks.org
Sign In Sign Up
Manage this list Sign In Sign Up

Keyboard Shortcuts

Thread View

  • j: Next unread message
  • k: Previous unread message
  • j a: Jump to all threads
  • j l: Jump to MailingList overview
thread

None

Anonymous

17 Dec 2003 17 Dec '03
11:17 p.m.

Jim Choate wrote:

...

I suspect that there is a certain level of misrepresentation of what went on during the Whiskey Rebellion (which I was aware of before your elucidation). Near as I can tell Washington acted responsibly within the bounds of the intent and word of the Constitution.

Here's a broad outline from memory. Some details may be in error: During the Revolution, many people lent their money to the Continental Congress so it could prosecute the war. During and after the Revolution, the credit rating of the Continental Congress dropped. Many of these people, such as those in Western Pennsylvania, sold their claim on the Continental Congress for nickels on the dollar, mostly to members of the better connected financial community in New York. Enter the Federal Government. After it was established, Hamilton, a well connected member of the financial community in New York, announced that the new Government would honor the debt of the Continental Congress. The people in Western Pennsylvania were not happy to have sold their debt. Where was the Federal government to get the money? Why, by taxing their whisky! As many of these people had fought and seen their friends and relatives die over the question of taxes and freedom, they were less than delighted with this new development. The financial community in New York was widely suspected of being sympathetic to the British, which made the new policies more upsetting. What you would expect to happen, happened. There was a substantial movement opposed to the Constitution. The Bill of Rights originated as a sweetener to appease this movement. It is fair to say everybody's fears have been realized. It may not have been the worst deal ever, though. While it caused the Civil War, it also prevented the Europeans from playing divide-and-conquer games with the States and made possible the most successful foreign policy in the history of the world. For the point of view of the skeptics see: Storing, Herbert J. Ed. "The Anti-Federalists" Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1985 (ISBN 0-226-77565-8) Just Another Cypherpunk

0 0
Reply
Sign in to reply online Use email software

Back to the thread

Back to the list

HyperKitty Powered by HyperKitty version 1.3.12.