Mark M. wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jan 1997 DataETRsch@aol.com wrote:
IN RESPONSE TO THE FLAME MAIL DATA RESEARCH HAS BEEN RECEIVING:
The 'flames' used as examples seemed to me to be nothing more than valid questions regarding the DataETR's claims for their software. (Big Hint / Questions from conferences with the word 'punks' in the name are not likely to be accompanied by bowing gestures and exclaimations of amazement at unsubstantiated claims).
0.390625% is the best possible percentage. Are all of you out there satisfied?
Not especially. I'd still be interested in the design criteria used to develop this algorithm. Until you publish the full source and technical data, I will have to assume that the algorithm is insecure.
Keep in mind that many CypherPunks dream in numbers. Toto