Ulf Möller wrote:
Have a look at:
David Chaum: Untraceable Electronic Mail, Return Addresses, and Digital Pseudonyms, Communications of the ACM 24 (1981) 2, pp 84--88, http://world.std.com/~franl/crypto/chaum-acm-1981.html
Do other list readers agree? How many people would this kill?
Wei Dai: Traffic analyzing Chaum's digital mix, 1995, http://www.eskimo.com/~weidai/traffic.txt
It is this kind of support for depraved violence which has poisoned discourse on this mailing list
Lance Cottrell: Mixmaster and remailer attacks, 1995, http://www.obscura.com/~loki/remailer/remailer-essay.html
This list reeks of death and violence. Apparently there is no problem which can't be solved by killing. Kill the innocents of D.C. Kill the children in the day care center in Oklahoma City. Drop more bombs on Japan. Cheer the cold-blooded murder of a government agent. Kill the children who scrawl graffiti on your mailbox.
Thomas Horton: Stylometry. In: R. Asher (ed.): The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Pergamon Press, 1994, pp 4383--4385.
You admit here that you've said you hope to see D.C. nuked.
Joseph Rudman, David I Holmes, Fiona J. Tweedie, R. Harald Baayen: The State of Authorship Attribution Studies, 1997, http://www.qucis.queensu.ca/achallc97/papers/s004.html
Nothing more than a forged spoof by TruthMangler.
Ivan Krsul, Eugene Spafford: Authorship Analysis: Identifying The Author of a Program, 1997, ftp://coast.cs.purdue.edu/pub/COAST/papers/krsul-authorship_analysis_NISSC.ps.Z
You have no right to set yourself apart from them. You are as ruthless and violent as the worst of them. Now maybe everyone will see what I mean when I say that those on this list now only stand for guns, violence, threats of terrorism and murder, racism, homophobia. Anne Ahole